On the street;...

by New Worker correspondent

Outsourcing was one of the issues exercising the security guards employed by Bidvest Noonan belonging to the small street union, the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB) at University College London (UCL) who joined in the massive day of strike action on Wednesday 1 February.
    In addition to a demand for a £15.00 hourly rate (which is the equivalent to that paid in 2002), they are seeking an end to outsourcing, and union recognition. In October UCL attempted to break a IWGB strike by employing subcontracting workers on a lower rate of pay in an attempt to break the last IWGB strike, despite running a £90 million yearly surplus.
This was condemned by University and College Union and the IWGB as an intimidatory strike breaking tactic and as a violation of UCL’s theoretical commitment to parity on account of these workers receiving lower rates of pay.
    The IWGB states that commitment to parity of terms and conditions with directly employed staff was won following IWGB strike action in 2019, while this resulted in improved pay, pension contributions and sick pay and annual leave entitlements full equality has not been achieved.
    Matteo Tiratelli, UCU’s Anti-Casualisation Officer at UCL added: “Outsourcing creates terrible working conditions for workers on the lowest grades at UCL, yet UCL management is determined to keep up this discriminatory practice. It is one of several ways in which working conditions are being worsened across the board. All staff at UCL are seeing our pay fall behind inflation, our jobs casualised and rights stripped away, and it is sadly not just staff, but students who are paying the price.”
    Yusuf Nur, a striking security guard, says: “I have young children and on the poverty pay I receive as an outsourced worker I am struggling to support them. I’ve been left with no choice but to strike - it’s the only way we can make our voices heard. After bullying, mistreatment and consistent basic errors with paying us our wages and pensions from Bidvest Noonan and neglect from UCL, we must fight for better conditions for each other and our families.”
The same union also claims victory in one of the north London borough of Barnet, which for two decades was held up as model of economical outsourcing by the Tory controlled council, who outsourced just about anything that was not nailed down.
    Now under Labour control, 330 affected workers presently employed by outsourcing multinational Capita, (or Crapita to Private Eye readers) will be brought back in-house from 1 April.
    2012 saw the Tory council hand over much of its services to Capita on decade-long contracts. Capita lived up to its nickname, with a decade of controversies including a multi-million-pound fraud and contracts running vastly over budget.
    After the May elections Labour won control of the council, and although the contracts had already been due to end next year, the council has fast-tracked plans to bring some services back in house.
    John Burgess, the union’s Barnet local government branch secretary declared: “This is good news for staff, good news for residents and good news for the services. I welcome the decision and look forward to welcoming back all the services back into Barnet Council where they all belong”.
    He pointed out that after a decade of campaigning, and a start to bringing services in-house: “there are still many issues to address for our members who are being TUPE’d”.
    “These include workplace inequalities such as staff being paid differently for the same role. Barnet UNISON is already seeking discussions with the council about harmonisation of the terms and conditions of the TUPE’d workforce”.
    Another strike involving outsourced workers is taking place in the north-west London borough of Hounslow whose most lovable of workers, Parking Enforcement Officers, started a strike which could last until 5 March.
    Employed by giant outsourcer Serco who last declared profits of £309.9 million, they are fighting for decent pay.
    Neighbouring boroughs Ealing and Brent councils recently conceded a pay rise after strike action. Civil enforcement officers and CCTV operators in Ealing received a 9 per cent rise pay increase back dated to April 2022 with low paid new starters getting 11.94 per cent, with another eight per cent from next April, and extra annual leave entitlement. In comparison, in Brent, workers are getting a total increase of pay rise of 10.7 per cent from last April with nine per cent to come in April.
    Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham said: “Serco and Hounslow council’s refusal to address the scourge of low pay is shameful. The truth is that the London Living Wage is not enough to live on. Serco is hugely wealthy. The Council and its outsourcer have the ability to pay workers more.
    “The strike will inevitably mean that parking restrictions across the borough will fall apart. Bosses need to realise the workers have Unite’s total support.”

The fight-back in London

Bexley

In the south London borough of Bexley another group of binmen are making progress in their dispute over pay and working conditions.
    Talks between contractors Countrystyle Recycling and Unite are taking place at conciliation service ACAS, which has enabled Unite to call off a planned three week strike which was set to continue until Friday 19th August.
    Unite acting national officer Clare Keogh said: “Following extensive negotiations held at Acas, sufficient progress was made to allow Unite to suspend strike action.
    “It is hoped that during further in-depth negotiations the remaining outstanding issues can be resolved and a satisfactory resolution to the dispute reached.” But the union warned that if the resulting offer is unacceptable strike action will resume on Saturday 20th August.
    The 100 binmen involved have already been on strike in the middle of last month, Countrystyle Recycling had taken over the contract in October.
    Unite accuses Countrystyle of offering “a below-inflation pay deal” to scrap a long-standing “job and finish” clause in their contracts. Regional officer Tabusam Ahmed added: “Our members are rightly asking for a pay rise that keeps up with rocketing prices. In response, Countrystyle is trying to punish them by scrapping a long-standing agreement”.

London School of Hygiene &Tropical Medicine 

Another long standing dispute involving cleaners and other support staff is that at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine led by the small street union, the Independent Workers of Great Britain (IWGB). The largely migrant workforce have recently won a long battle to become directly employed by the School, which is part of the University of London. However they face other battles because while the union represents the majority of support workers the School still refuses to recognise the union.
    The IWGB workers have long suffered under a two-tier system which means they have fewer rights and worse terms and conditions than directly employed colleagues. One example was that during the pandemic they were not entitled to proper sick pay.
    Last August the School finally agreed to bring the support workers in-house and end the discrimination, but this has yet to be fully implemented.
    However the devil is in the detail, as the IWGB branch soon found that Management goodwill was short-lived. They objected to actual workers, rather than IWGB officials attending meetings, and the approach to these regular meetings with the trade union was shocking. No agendas were prepared and the vital issue of (very low) pay was not to be discussed.
    In March the School’s Director said that he would only stick to the letter of TUPE regulations and would not bring workers onto even the lowest grade on the School’s pay scale of £11.30 an hour.
    IWGB demands that its members, who presently get £11.05 per hour, which is below the lowest grade on the university pay scale, are brought onto the School’s Pay Grade 3 (£14.50), the grade that similar staff are on. Instead the School is negotiating pay with Unison, which does not represent the workers and has ignored IWGB’s grading demands.
    In April a lively protest about these issues outside the School, at which a petition was handed in, was met by Management calling the police, who speedily decided there was no cause for action.
    Management soon took revenge. After the protest four workers were suspended by the subcontractor Samsic for taking part in the protest, with others later suspended for taking part in union meetings, IWGB thinks this may have been at the School’s orders and the union is now submitting a tribunal detriment and blacklisting claim against Samsic.
    The IWGB strongly refutes Management claims that the April protest was violent and intimidating. It also complains that it is denying the union details of their plans to bring them in-house.
    Strike action finally took place last month, with a promise of more to come. Before the strike workers faced repeated illegal attempts to intimidate workers including threats to cancel annual leave already booked.
    During July’s strike Samsic made use of agency workers to cover the strikers’ shift. This, IWGB say “is a criminal offence, under Regulation 7 of the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Business Regulations 2003”. Two IWGB officials entered the foyer of the building to report this to the security manager and to flag that this was a serious criminal offence and should be stopped immediately. The security manager called the police.
    LSHTM management claims, without evidence that the IWGB has “verbally abused and threatened at work” the reception staff. However 126 scientists, including past and present members of staff, support the action and accuse Management of tarnishing the reputation of the School. They demand that management meet “essential workers’ demands of fair treatment and pay” and “the immediate annulation of disciplinary sanctions faced by some workers engaged in union activities and campaigns.”
    One of those supporting the workers is Kings College London lecturer in global health and School graduate, Sabah Boufkhed, who says: “Our academic and global health community has taken a stand with less privileged colleagues who have organised themselves to address their poor labour conditions. We know from the research we do that these conditions are a major determinant of health. I hope that LSHTM’s senior management will immediately address the situation and make a step towards addressing causes of health and social inequities within their own premises.”

Battersea

South of the river, in Battersea, another union recognition battle is being fought by another small street union. This is at the Latchmere Leisure Centre in Battersea, where the United Voices of Workers (UVW) have applied to the Central Arbitration Committee for statutory recognition.
    Here the largely Bolivian cleaners, are demanding to be paid the London Living Wage instead of what they get which is just a few pennies above the lower Minimum Living Wage. They also complain that they currently only get the legal minimum statutory sick pay and they are demanding a full sick pay scheme.
    Juan Jiménez Yanez, one of the cleaners and UVW members, said: “We, the workers of Latchmere Leisure Centre, are almost on the minimum wage and we are asking for a pay rise. We want the London Living Wage (LLW) and we ask for the support of all our fellow workers to support us in our cause. Keep up the fight comrades!”
The centre is owned by Wandsworth Council, who pay £3.7 million a year to Places for People Leisure Management (PPLM), to run its leisure centres on their behalf. The lifetime cost of the contract with PPLM is £22 million

    PPLM’s parent company, Places for People (PfP) is actually one of the UK’s largest private housing associations with more than £4.9 billion in assets and is landlord over 220,000 owned or managed homes in addition to managing 108 leisure facilities across the country.
    PfP made a pre-tax profit of nearly £80 million last year with £700 million in reserve, yet only pays cleaners at Latchmere five pence more than the £9.50 minimum wage.
    Labour won the local elections in Wandsworth this year ending years of Tory rule in the borough. And Simon Hogg, the leader of Wandsworth’s new Labour Council, says: “there is no moral justification for paying people less than the LWW, especially at a time when household bills are going through the roof and families are struggling. Any company that tenders for a council contract will need to guarantee that their workforce is paid the LLW as a minimum.”
    In September 2023 the leisure centre management contract will be renewed, but UVW point out that with the present high inflation this does not help the present situation and is demanding that the UVW to be recognised as the cleaners’ union.
    It is about time that all of Britain’s unions unite and force Labour councils and other public bodies to bring essential workers in-house and cut out parasitical middlemen who do nothing except collect dividends.

West End

On Tuesday some of Britain’s less essential workers start balloting for strike action. They work for Grosvenor Casinos in London. Despite helping to redistribute money from people with more money than sense to their bosses they are being offered a below inflation pay cut.
    Their union, Unite, points out that Grosvenor’s owner, the Rank Group, made a £40 million profit last year but is only offering to increase the wages of its lowest paid staff to the bare London Living Wage of £11.20 an hour. At the same time staff paid more than that are only being offered a 4.3 per cent increase when the real inflation rate (RPI) is 11.8 per cent.
    The rates of pay are little compensation given that much of the work involves unsociable hours and late night working.
    Unite national officer Dave Turnbull said: “If workers vote for strike action it will inevitably cause huge disruption across the company’s operations but this dispute is entirely of Grosvenor Casinos own making. Even at this late stage strike action can still be averted if Grosvenor Casinos returns to the negotiating table and makes a realistic pay offer to our members”. The New Worker is not giving odds on the ballot result.

In the departure lounge

by New Worker correspondent

Another seasonal strike is taking place at Heathrow Airport, where Cargo workers employed by British Airways voted almost unanimously for nine days of strike action starting on Christmas Day and ending on the first Saturday of the New Year.
    The 840 workers belonging to Unite agreed to the action in protest at BA’s attempts to fire and rehire the workforce, a move which would result in pay cuts of between 20–25 per cent, in addition to substantial cuts to terms and conditions.
    Being very reasonable people, Unite delayed announcing strike dates to allow BA a final opportunity to come forward with a meaningful offer – but as might be expected, BA were less reasonable and failed to respond.
    Despite the pandemic, the airport is very busy as a result of the manufactured no-deal Brexit panic that has affected the ports. Given the huge reduction in passenger numbers, it is the one part of the airport business that has remained profitable throughout the pandemic.
    Unite assistant general secretary and wannabe-General Secretary Howard Beckett declared that: “Unite has bent over backwards to give British Airways the opportunity to make a fair offer to its cargo workers and it has failed to do so. As a consequence Unite has no option but to announce strike action. Our members are taking this action as a last resort. They are aware that it will cause severe disruption to air freight entering the UK but they simply can’t afford to lose a quarter of their pay.”
    Although Unite has reached agreement with BA in all the other sections of the company, the managers of the cargo workers have proved a tougher nut to crack.
    On Monday, 4,000 workers directly employed by Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL) started a strike on similar issues. A car-based rally and socially distanced picket lines took place around the airport. Local Labour MP John McDonnell told a rally: “HAL management disgracefully saw COVID as an opportunity to cut pay, jobs and conditions. What they are trying to do is to use a temporary crisis to achieve permanent savings. It is exploitation. We need to draw a line in the sand.”
    Many workers have come round to the view that a more co-ordinated approach is needed. The strike continues on Thursday and is timed to coincide with the pre-Christmas getaway.
    Unite regional co-ordinating officer Wayne King said: “The airport's success was built on its workforce, who have continued to ensure it operates throughout the pandemic, on occasion risking their health. HAL has repaid them by conducting the most brutal fire and rehire operation ever seen in the UK.”
    The airport has suffered an 84 per cent fall in passenger numbers and lost its place as Europe’s busiest airport to Paris Charles de Gaulle. Last Friday HAL announced that because of low passenger traffic its Terminal 4 will remain closed until the end of 2021.

Transport workers take action!

Ticket Offices at Risk

By New Worker correspondent

RMT has also announced that it is balloting for strike action over plans to close ticket offices on the London Overground.

For the last two years the transport union has been campaigning against plans to axe Overground ticket offices. Although the initial plans were pushed back the union is now accusing both Arriva Rail London and Transport for London “of trying to smuggle through a closure programme by stealth”.

 Specifically, on Monday the union announced it had received confirmation that revised ticket office hours (ie reduced to only between 7:30–10:30 am) will be implemented at Bruce Grove and South Action whilst temporary closures of two other stations, which were in place whilst the review was being conducted, will now be closed permanently. More closures are forecast if the present proposals are not defeated.

Overall the plans mean a cut in hours of over 65 per cent across the Overground, with some stations cut by 80 per cent.

RMT points out that stations will become less safe, secure and accessible, passengers will not be able to access all ticket types and services at a machine, elderly and disabled passengers, will struggle to purchase tickets and get advice, and the present round will make it easier for London Overground to close more ticket offices and reduce staffing even further in the future.

RMT General Secretary Mick Cash said: “The consultative process has been exposed as a sham and our members are not prepared to sit idly by when safety and accessibility are once again sacrificed for profit.

“The Mayor must step up and demand these ticket offices remain open and that TfL [Transport for London] is adequately funded to service all the people of London equally instead of employing measures that will discriminate against the disabled and vulnerable.”

 

On the River

By New Worker correspondent

Another group of London’s transport workers will also embark on a 24-strike the week before Christmas. They are 56 employees on the Woolwich Ferry (established 1308) who are employed by Briggs Marine Contractors Ltd to take an estimated 2.6 million passengers per year across the Thames.

This dispute is about getting the London Living Wage (£10.75 per hour) on basic pay, the imposition of changes to overtime and shift working, failure to adhere to the agreed job evaluation scheme, and a failure to deal with equality issues. Additionally, new ships introduced in January have had continual technical problems.

In June and July, 10 one-day strikes failed to resolve the issues and two years ago there was an acrimonious and long-running dispute with the same employer, which runs the service on behalf of Transport for London (TfL), over a bullying culture and health & safety issues.

Speaking on behalf of the workers, Unite regional officer Onay Kasab noted that: “It is understatement to say the management at Briggs Marine Contractors has a very poor record when it comes to employment relations over a number of years.

“Unfortunately, bad employment practice seems endemic within the management team as they continue to ignore previous agreements on job evaluation and equalities, and they ‘slice and dice’ the pay of an already low-paid workforce.”

The company claims that it is indeed paying the London Living Wage – but only by taking into account overtime and weekend working is it doing so, instead of only counting basic pay.

Kasab concluded by saying that: “Unite will not stand by and allow this horror show of employment practice to continue. It is high time that Transport for London reviewed its contract with this notorious employer.”

End Holiday Hunger!

By Theo Russell

Members of Camden Unite Community joined protests across Britain last Friday by blocking the street outside Caxton House in Westminster, London, home of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), against the hated Universal Credit benefit system.

Large protests also took place in Liverpool, Manchester and elsewhere, focusing on the issue of ‘holiday hunger’ affecting thousands of children and their families who rely on free school meals.

According to Unite, the loss of free school meals adds £30–£40 for parents, and a Unite survey found that 19 per cent struggle make ends meet during the school holidays.

Nearly 70 per cent of parents said they were skipping meals and 41 per cent said they were relying on foodbanks.

In the central London boroughs covered by Camden Unite Community, Camden, Westminster, and Kensington and Chelsea, 12,750 children are eligible for free school meals.

Camden Unite Community also protested earlier outside Euston Food Bank, yards from Euston Station, and after the DWP action moved around the corner to the plush offices currently housing the Tory party’s head office.

Unite Community North West regional co-ordinator Sheila Coleman said: “It is shameful that on a sunny summer’s day, children, instead of having days at the seaside, are spending their holidays being fed by charity.

“Foodbanks, community centres and schools are helping to keep poor children alive. This is in 21st-century Britain, one of the richest countries.”

She said that the problem was not the north–south divide, but class division and the “few haves and the many have-nots”.

Paula Peters, Unite Community chairwoman for Bromley and Croydon, said that Universal Credit was “ideologically designed to cause mass stress and harm, and to ramp up poverty and hunger. There are 8.4 million people who are struggling to feed themselves and four million in poverty, including many disabled people”.

The fight against Universal Credit, which according to a United Nations (UN) report appears to be designed to punish people for no reason, must go on until it is scrapped, and Unite Community is mobilising thousands of people who are not working or retired in communities across Britain to join this fight.