By Theo Russell
A NEW Maoist party emerged last week in Nepal which has
adopted the name of the party that led the people’s war from 1996 to 2006. The
split comes after months of tension and protests within the Unified Communist Party of Nepal
(Maoist) (UCPNM), led by Prachanda and current premier Baburam Bhattarai,
following the 2006 peace agreement.
The new party is
led by general secretary Ram Bahadur Thapa (“Badal”) and chair Kiran Bhaidya,
the former leader of the People’s Liberation Army.
And
at a meeting last week in London Peter Tobin, the editor of a new
English-language Nepali magazine Red
Front, who now lives in Kathmandu, explained what
led to the foundation of the new Communist Party of Nepal, Maoist
(CPNM).
CP Gajurel, a
leader of the new party, accused Prachanda and Bhattarai of: “Abandoning all
the achievements of the revolution: the base areas, the people’s communes, the
people’s courts, and finally giving up the People’s Liberation Army.”
In addition land
seized from feudal landowners and tilled by peasant communes has been returned
to its former owners, another humiliating agreement has been signed with India, squatters
settlements have been bulldozed, and anti-China activities have multiplied.
The Maoists had
led the struggle against the feudal monarchy and by 2006 the Maoist guerrillas had gained
control of 80 per cent of Nepal. Under the peace
agreement 19,000 PLA fighters were held under UN
auspices in “cantonments” to be integrated into the Nepalese Army as an equal
and distinct force, and 7,000 weapons were put into storage.
But when the UN
peacekeeping mission departed on 10th April the Nepalese Army
entered the camps and, in Gajurel’s words: “They forced a humiliating surrender
of the PLA combatants”. Their weapons ended up
in the army’s hands and, all but a handful of the PLA fighters have
returned to the rural areas.
In response the
“Red Faction” Maoists took to the streets across Nepal, denouncing and
burning effigies of Prachanda and Bhattarai. In an example of growing
repression a torchlight protest in Kathmandu was
baton-charged by police who targeted the leader, Badal.
Tobin said:
“Prachanda presented the peace agreement, which led to PLA fighters leaving the ‘Red Base’ areas in the
countryside, as a tactical and temporary measure. The rationale was that there
was a military stalemate,
the People’s Liberation Army could not break into the urban centres, and that
the agreement was the only way to gain access to the masses in the cities.
“But the lack of
inner party democracy in the UCPNM and the cult around the ‘Prachanda Path’
have led to the collapse of the agreement, and to a situation where Prachanda
lost all credibility with many party members. Prachanda, now known as ‘Mr India’ has dismissed the Red Faction as ‘anarchists’ but
many cadres have deserted his ranks to join the new party.
“Out of 130 members of the central committee
of the UCPNM, 44 have joined the new party. The leadership of the new party has
is committed to restoring collective leadership and democratic centralism,”
Tobin said.
“The
establishment may have all the money and all the properties, but they don’t
have the cadres. On May Day this year the Red Faction held two separate
large-scale celebrations in Kathmandu while Prachanda’s party had to
resort to bussing supporters into the capital.
“In my estimate
one in three people in Kathmandu are Maoists. Nepali communism and
Maoism have brought a hope to the people for the future of many classes and castes.”
Tobin pointed
out: “India controls 80 per
cent of Nepal’s financial
sector and 70 per cent of manufacturing industry, and almost all Nepali parties
including the mass communist parties have close ties with Delhi, apart from some
small royalist nationalist
parties.
“But the new CPNM
is the only party to take a stand against Indian expansionism, and to recognise
that China is not
expansionist.”
An agreement to
promote investment signed by Bhattarai on his first visit to Delhi caused a huge a
backlash across the political spectrum due to a clause promising compensation
to Indian investors for losses resulting from “war, armed conflict, national
emergency, insurrection or riots”.
Only the UCPNM and the Nepali Congress
(closely tied to the ruling Indian Congress Party) supported it.
In addition to India’s strong
influence, the US presence has
steadily grown. Tobin said: “In 2009 the
CIA set up a daily English language newspaper and slick website, República, which is linked to the Washington Post.
“The US has played a
growing role in Nepal since 2002 when
it bankrolled the recruitment of an extra 20,000 troops for the Nepalese Army.
This greatly angered India and was a major
reason for New Delhi’s decision to
abandon King Gyanendra leading to the fall of the monarchy in 2008.”