Outrage
at anti-homeless spikes
THE
INSTALLATION of ground spikes in places where homeless people have been
sleeping in some parts of London has sparked outrage throughout the social
media.
Hundreds
of people are losing their homes through cuts in benefits, rising rents, the
bedroom tax and problems paying mortgages, through divorce, through mental
illness and other causes.
And
the sight of sleeping bags on pavements in central London has returned and is
increasing rapidly. Homeless people seek sheltered doorways and other spots out
of the wind and rain to try to sleep.
But
this has prompted those in up-market areas to install the blunt spikes in the
nooks and doorways to prevent homeless people sleeping there.
Photographs
of metal studs on the doorsteps of a luxury flat building on Southwark Bridge
Road in central London spurred an “anti-homeless spikes” hashtag campaign by
Ethical Pioneer Twitter page.
An
anonymous resident of the residential complex told the Daily Telegraph
: “There was a homeless man asleep there about six weeks ago. Then about
two weeks ago all of a sudden studs were put up outside. I presume it is to
deter homeless people from sleeping there.”
Crisis,
a charity for homeless people, immediately issued a statement of condemnation.
“It
is a scandal that anyone should sleep on the streets in 21st century Britain.
“Yet
over the last three years rough sleeping has risen steeply across the country
and by a massive 75 per cent in London.
“Behind
these numbers are real people struggling with a lack of housing, cuts to
benefits and cuts to homelessness services to help them rebuild their lives,”
said Katharine Sacks-Jones, head of policy and campaigns at Crisis.
“They
deserve better than to be moved on to the next doorway along the street. We
will never tackle rough sleeping with studs in the pavement. Instead we must
deal with the causes,” she added.
Home
Secretary Theresa May had a different view. She tweeted “Proud of our British designers who've managed
to make practical anti-homeless spikes into a thing of beauty.”
RMT backs Taxi protest
THE
TRANSPORT union RMT backed a massive protest by thousands of London cabbies on
Wednesday 11th June.
It
centred around Trafalgar Square from 2pm onwards, aiming to gridlock the
capital, as organisations representing the trade unite in defiance of measures
being driven through by Mayor Boris Johnson which amount to an all-out assault
on the industry.
RMT
backed the protest, under the banner “Cabbies against Boris”, which has been
mobilised against the many improper and unlawful decisions imposed on the taxi
trade by Transport for London and the Mayor.
These
include the improper London Taxi Age limit and failure to enforce Private Hire
Law (including the recent issues with Uber the mini cab booking app) and a host
of other damaging decisions.
The
Mayor of London was due to answer questions in the London Assembly at 10am on
the same day.
In
evidence to the Mayor, taxi organisations have exposed the nonsense of the
London Taxi Age Limit and the entirely bogus arguments about the impact that
scrapping the older vehicles has on emissions and pollution in London. Cabbies
against Boris has also drawn attention to the vested interests driving the
policy and the fact that a similar scheme in South Wales had to be withdrawn as
the consultation was found to be loaded.
The
latest undermining of the Private Hire Laws by apps such as Uber is just
another attempt to casualise and weaken the professional and safe licensed taxi
trade and the long-established regulations around the right to ply for hire,
coming after the exposure of the illegal ranks around London and the drive to
destroy the airport services.
Huge
and wealthy multi-national corporations like Google are now trying to use their
financial clout to bully their way into areas that have been governed by
Private Hire Laws in London for decades and which have delivered safe, reliable
and efficient services for Londoners down the years.
Kew News
by our Gardening
Correspondent
ON
MONDAY unions representing workers at Kew Gardens in west London and local Tory
MP Zac Goldsmith handed in a 100,000 signature petition at Downing Street
opposing huge job cuts at Kew Gardens.
The
gardens are not just an agreeable facility for the well-heeled constituents of
the millionaire MP. As former Director Sir Ghillean Prance said: “The
scientific work of Kew is vital for the future of biodiversity and for climate
change studies.”
It
is an important scientific research centre maintaining the world’s premier
plant and fungal collections, including 30,000 living plants, one billion seeds
and the DNA of 20 per cent of the world’s plant species.
Speaking
on behalf of the scientists working there Prospect negotiator Julie Flanagan
said: “Kew has already lost approximately 50 posts, vacancies are not being
filled and management is planning the loss of a further 50-70 posts. Cutting
staff reduces Kew’s capacity to fulfill its statutory obligations, to carry out
its leading science and conservation, and to generate its own revenue”.
The
job cuts come after a steep reduction in Kew’s public funding from the
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs first announced in 2010 and
imposed year-on-year ever since.
PCS fights
passport office cuts
THE
CIVIL service union PCS has threatened industrial action if job cuts that have
caused the current passport backlogs are not addressed.
A
letter landing on Passport Office chief executive Paul Pugh’s desk this morning
states the union attributes the current crisis to “major job cuts and office
closures during the past five years”, as well as the increasing use of private
companies.
It
comes as the union is preparing to hold a consultative ballot of all its
quarter of a million civil and public service members with a view to taking
part in joint union action over pay, starting with a one-day strike in July.
The
passports letter points out 22 interview offices and one application processing
centre have closed in recent years and 315 staff, one tenth of the workforce,
have lost their jobs. It also notes staff are battling a backlog of almost half
a million cases.
The
union says its warnings about the damage cuts would do have been ignored and
blames senior officials for a “lack of forward thinking”, adding: “We do not
accept that the current problems can solely be down to unusual demand.”
The
union also complains it was not consulted on the redeployment of workers to
clear the backlogs, including 25 per cent of the staff who work on fraud
prevention and investigation.
No comments:
Post a Comment