LABOUR leader Ed Miliband last week condemned David
Cameron’s “silence” on the genocidal onslaught by Israel on the people of Gaza,
which has been continuing now for a month.
Miliband said that Cameron’s “silence” on the issue was
“inexplicable” and called on the Prime Minister to publicly oppose the deaths
of “hundreds of innocent Palestinians”, which he said was “wrong and
unjustifiable”.
Cameron’s response was to accuse Miliband of “undermining
attempts at peace negotiations”. As the carnage raged, Cameron told Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu he had his "strong support" for
Israel's right to take "proportionate action" to defend itself.
Earlier this year Miliband visited Israel and was shown
sites where Hamas rockets have landed in the past.
Appearing on LBC radio last weekend, Miliband said: "If
I was David Cameron... I would be spending my time on doing everything I can to
put pressure on both sides to have that ceasefire that is required.
"I think he is in the wrong place on this, because I
agree with him about Hamas – Hamas is a terrible and disgusting organisation –
but I think he should have said from the outset that this incursion by Israel
into Gaza was not going to solve the problem."
So there is little hope for justice for the Palestinians from
either the Tory of Labour leadership.
But clearly the stance of both is being affected by the
massive and rising level of protests throughout the country and the world at
the continuing massacre.
Last Friday 1st August saw another massive
demonstration outside London’s Israeli embassy and on Saturday 2nd
August pro-Palestinian demonstrators occupied the BBC in Bristol for its biased
reporting of the ongoing massacre.
Campaigners occupied the lawn outside BBC Bristol over its
Gaza reporting.
"Seems likely to be the only time an occupation is
commented on,” said comedian Mark Thomas.
“If BBC coverage of Israel’s systematic destruction of lives
wasn’t sufficient to make people hot under the collar, the corporation’s
justification of its role should do so,” said a spokesperson.
“Our role is to explain what is happening and why and we
endeavour to reflect a range of voices amid deeply held views.
“If that’s what it’s supposed to do, the BBC is failing its
own criteria. At no time do its correspondents explain that the Palestinians
are a people under military occupation and that Israel is pursuing a relentless
colonisation of the West Bank, which, under the 1993 Oslo accords, is supposed
to be the site of an independent Palestinian state.
“Israeli occupation forces should have evacuated the land
they conquered in 1967 so a Palestinian Authority could be established and a
permanent settlement finalised.
One reason alone stymied that agreement — Tel Aviv’s refusal
to end its occupation of the West Bank, preferring instead to construct
Jews-only settlements and infrastructure.”
No comments:
Post a Comment