Mushtaq Lasharie makes a point |
by New Worker
correspondent
KASHMIRIS
living in London last Sunday held a protest march in Whitehall and the next day
packed an evening meeting in Portcullis House to mark the 67th anniversary
Kashmir’s “Black Day” and to publicise the fight for human rights in Kashmir.
The British Empire in August 1947,
reluctantly and after a long and bitter campaign for independence, withdrew its
rule from the Indian subcontinent, dividing it first into two nations, India
and Pakistan.
India was mainly Hindu and Pakistan
mainly Muslim – but thousands of people ended up on the wrong side of the
boundaries, leading to bloody strife and refugees pouring across the borders in
both directions.
Other than the areas directly under the
British rule there were around 565 Princely States, whose lands comprised of
two-fifths of the total area of India and a population of 99 million. These princely
states were given the authority to decide which of the two newly formed states
– India or Pakistan – to join, taking into account factors such as geographical
proximity and the wishes of their people.
In the case of a dispute or when a
particular state was unable to decide, the question of accession was to be
determined by a plebiscite.
The Maharajah of Jammu and Kashmir Hari
Singh, whose state was situated between the two new countries, could not decide
which country to join as he himself was Hindu but 77 per cent of the population
of Kashmir consisted of Muslims.
Kashmir’s “Black Day” was 27th October
1947 when the Indian army marched in on the pretext of defending the population
from being annexed by Pakistan which led to the first Indo-Pakistani war. It
ended with a cease-fire agreement in 1948 that left three fifths of Kashmir in
Indian hands.
India promised to hold a referendum to
determine the will of the majority but after repeated promises that has never
taken place and the Indian government has treated the parts of Kashmir it
occupies as one of its own provinces and treats the Muslim community as hostile
and dangerous separatists.
So far as it is possible to determine
most of the people there would prefer a future as a state independent of both
India and Pakistan.
At the meeting in Portcullis House, chaired
by Dave Anderson MP and hosted by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Third
World Solidarity, speaker after speaker told of the long litany of killings,
arbitrary arrests, torture and disappearances inflicted on the Kashmiri people
by the Indian authorities.
Khalid Mahmood, the Labour MP for Perry
Barr, told the packed meeting room that people in Kashmir, when they leave
their homes never know when, or if, they will ever return.
The Indian army is in illegal occupation
of Kashmir, just as Israel is in illegal occupation of Palestine; United
Nations resolutions have been ignored; promises and pledges for elections have
come and gone.
He called for a formal agenda for
progress, to raise awareness of the campaign to the same level as the campaign
for justice for Palestine.
David Ward, Lib-Dem MP for Bradford
East, referred to Kashmir as the forgotten conflict and said he was heartened
by newcomers to the campaign. He said the conflict cannot be resolved by
military means but must be resolved through a peaceful dialogue.
Abdul Rashid spoke of a litany of
atrocities, of disappearances, of people arrested who turned up later dead in
the river. And he spoke of India’s claim to be the biggest democracy on the
planet. “Then let them behave like a democracy,” he said, “let the people of
Kashmir have their civil rights and let them allow international inspectors
in.”
Saundra Satterjee, who chairs Third
World Solidarity, said the campaign was not anti-Indian but that throughout
India Muslim communities were underrepresented at all levels of government.
Other speakers included Lord Hussain of
Luton, His Excellency Syed Ibne Abbas, the Pakistani ambassador to Britain and
Mushtaq Lasharie, the organiser for the All Party Group on Third World
Solidarity.
There
were many contributions from the floor from Kashmiris, refugees, with
first-hand experience of life under oppression from the Indian army. One
described his country as “the largest and most beautiful prison in the world”.
No comments:
Post a Comment