New Communist Party (NCP) leader Andy
Brooks successfully led the opposition to an anti-communist motion at a
students’ union discussion at the Bloomsbury Campus of University College
London (UCL) this week.
The UCL Debating
Society is the oldest society at UCL and the third oldest debating society in
England. The event was part of their Monday Night Public Debate Programme,
which aims to raise awareness of key current issues and challenge people’s
opinions.
The organisers
said that given that many commentators are predicting the end of neoliberalism
and the rise of socialism’s popularity in Britain, there was now a need to
explore why so many right-wing thinkers are try to create a moral equivalence
between fascism and communism and demonise the ideology’s symbol. They said
that further discussion on this topic is required and that a large part of the
responsibility for doing so lies in universities and student societies, such as
the UCL Debating Society, that reach the entire student body.
The motion that
"This House believes that the Hammer and Sickle should be considered a
hate symbol” was moved by representatives of the reactionary Henry Jackson
Society and the Institute of Economic Affairs, another right-wing think-tank.
The movers
repeated the usual Cold War litany about Stalin’s “crimes”, Pol Pot, gulags and
“repression” – but their arguments were easily demolished by Andy Brooks, whose
case was ably supported by another London student.
The NCP leader
said that the banning of communist symbols was the precursor for banning
communist parties that wasn’t even done in the imperialist heartlands during
the height of the Cold War. It was being done now by the Ukrainian fascist
regime and the other reactionary governments in eastern Europe because they
fear the resurgence of the working-class movement and seek to suppress it by
using back-door methods to circumvent European law that forbids the banning of
political parties or the establishment of one-party states. Though these
regimes equate communism with fascism they don’t really believe this – if they
did they wouldn’t elevate their past fascist leaders, such as the Ukrainian
collaborators idolised by the Kiev regime, or the pre-war clerical-fascist
leaders of Poland and Hungary who have now been incorporated into their
official historical narrative.
A lively debate
followed the openings, but the opposition had clearly won the day and it ended
with the defeat of the reactionary motion at the vote.
The UCL Debating
Society was first established in 1828 to encourage debate, freedom of speech
and critical thought amongst the student community. It holds regular meetings
throughout the academic year that are open to anyone who wishes to attend.
No comments:
Post a Comment