Showing posts with label Mayor of London. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mayor of London. Show all posts

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Ticket Troubles


By New Worker correspondent

The RMT transport union launched a fresh campaign this week to halt London Overground ticket office closures. It is opposing plans to cut hours at 45 stations to the bare minimum and to close the ticket offices altogether at Brondesbury, White Hart Lane and West Hampstead.
London Overground last year planned to close 51 ticket offices on the network. The RMT launched a campaign however, and thousands of London Overground passengers opposed the closures, forcing the Mayor of London to intervene and promise to keep the ticket offices open.
As the New Worker hits the doormats on Friday the union will be having a day of action, with a leafleting and postcard campaign taking place at stations around the capital.
Under the revised new proposals, many stations would only be open in the mornings between 07:30–10:00am, Monday to Friday.
This would equate to a cut in hours of over 65 per cent across the Overground. Many stations are facing cuts in hours of over 80 per cent.
As a result many ticket offices would be closed for large parts of the day, resulting in stations becoming less safe, secure and accessible, and passengers will not be able to access all ticket types and services at a machine. Many people, including some elderly and disabled passengers, would struggle to purchase tickets and get advice.
London Overground is presently owned by the German State rail company, which made a profit of £4.6 million last year so it can well afford to provide a decent public service.
RMT’s General Secretary Mick Cash warned: “These plans to cut ticket office opening hours are about cutting costs and maximising profits and fly in the face of the Mayor’s promise last year to keep the ticket offices open.
“RMT will be fighting to keep ticket offices fully open and oppose the proposed cuts and we expect the same widespread support from the travelling public that we had when fought to save ticket offices last year.”

Friday, September 29, 2017

Cabbies welcome Uber ban



BLACK cab drivers in London who belong to the unions Unite and GMB last week praised the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, and Transport for London (TfL) for putting the safety of Londoners ahead of big corporate interests by deciding not to renew Uber’s licence to operate in London.
Commenting chair of London’s Unite black cab section Jim Kelly said: “The mayor of London Sadiq Khan and Transport for London have done the right thing in putting the safety of passengers and Londoners ahead of the big corporate interests of Uber.
“Dogged by controversy, Uber’s approach has been to exploit workers and bend the rules while trying to brush passenger safety concerns under the carpet.
“No one is above the law and today’s decision will be welcomed by London’s trusted professional black cab drivers. It signals that the mayor of London and Transport for London are not prepared to allow London to become the ‘wild west’ of the cab trade and put passengers at risk.
“In the coming weeks Uber will no doubt throw all its legal and corporate lobbying might to overturn this decision. We would urge the mayor of London and Transport for London to stand firm and continue to stand up for the safety of Londoners and the capital’s trusted cabbies.”
GMB said that the TfL decision was a major victory for drivers’ rights and for passenger safety. Last year the union won an employment tribunal case, which proved Uber’s drivers are employed by the firm, not self-employed as Uber had claimed. That means they should be entitled to holiday pay, a guaranteed minimum wage and safety protections, as well as other basic employment rights.
The £51 billion San Francisco transport giant has been controversial around the world for circumventing workers’ rights and pay minimums in many countries where it operates.
Uber’s initial five-year licence allowed them to operate a business of up to 40,000 cars in London. But unlike other firms, they refused to give drivers either basic employment rights or the full freedoms that come with genuine self-employment.
respect
GMB, working with global corporate campaigners SumOfUs.org and the TUC, handed in a 100,000-strong petition last week to City Hall. It called for TfL to force Uber to respect workers’ rights and passenger safety or get out of London.
GMB found that a member working exclusively for Uber received just £5.03 per hour in August 2015 after costs and fees were taken into account.
That’s significantly below the national minimum wage. Uber also deducted sums from drivers’ pay, including when customers make complaints, and often without informing the drivers in advance.
When Uber’s licence came up for renewal earlier this year TfL extended it by only four months with a warning to the company to improve its practices. Last week TfL concluded that Uber had failed to use the four months to correct its failings.
There were many areas of serious concern, including its handling of allegations of sexual assault by its drivers against passengers.
Freedom of Information data obtained by The Sun last year showed that the Metropolitan Police investigated 32 drivers for rape or sexual assault of a passenger between May 2015 and May 2016.
In August, Metropolitan Police Inspector Neil Billany wrote to TfL about his concern that the company was failing to investigate properly allegations against its drivers.
He revealed that the company had continued to employ a driver after he was accused of sexual assault. According to Inspector Billany, the same driver went on to assault another female passenger before he was removed.
The letter said: “By not reporting to police promptly, Uber are allowing situations to develop that clearly affect the safety and security of the public.”
This month, TfL informed Uber that background checks on thousands of its drivers were invalid. The drivers were given 28 days to reapply for the procedure or risk losing their licence.
Uber has responded as Unite predicted — by launching an appeal against the decision and a propaganda war and petition against the decision, backed by the Evening Standard, which is currently edited by former Chancellor George Osborne. He is paid £650,000 a year by fund manager BlackRock, which has a stake in taxi app firm worth about £500 million.
The National Union of Journalists’ ethics council said that the Evening Standard should note Osborne’s role at BlackRock alongside newspaper and online articles it publishes about Uber.

Friday, August 25, 2017

Grenfell Tower



Fire danger from faulty white goods

 

THE LONDON Fire Brigade (LFB) last week called on the Government to take urgent action regarding the dangers from electrical household goods such as refrigerators and washing machines.
The LFB was particularly critical of the Government’s failure to implement any of its recommendations a year after a faulty Indesit tumble drier caused a serious fire in a tower block in Shepherd’s Bush, which was attended by 20 fire engines and 110 firefighters.
No one was killed in this incident but more than 100 families had to be evacuated.
A faulty Hotpoint fridge-freezer is thought to have been the original source of the fire on 14th June this year in Grenfell towers, which cost at least 88 lives, though the inquiry into that fire has yet to begin and the rapid spread of that fire across the insulation cladding tiles on the outside of that building will also feature in that inquiry.
The LFB is demanding a Government-backed single register for all product recalls in Britain to be readily accessible to consumers online and better regulation of second-hand appliances.
The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, along with other campaigners, has added his name to the demand sent by the LFB to Theresa May to demand action to stop further fires.
Although nobody was killed in the Shepherd’s Bush blaze, more than 100 families were evacuated, with 26 being found temporary accommodation in hotels owing to the extent of the damage.
The brigade says that nearly one fire per day in London involves white goods. Between 2010 and 2016 there have been nine fatalities and 298 injuries as a result of fires involving white goods in London.
The figures do not include those who died in the Grenfell fire because the causes of these fatalities are subject to an inquest.
Hotpoint urged owners of its fridge-freezers to check their model numbers for safety reasons immediately after the fire.
Last week an inquest resumed into a fatal fire in north Wales, which may have started in or around a tumble dryer. Bernard Hender, 19, and Doug McTavish, 39, died after a blaze at a flat in Llanrwst in October 2014. At an earlier hearing, experts disagreed over what caused the blaze.
The LFB has made a series of urgent calls for action to make white goods safer as part of its Total Recalls campaign, which calls for a single, publicly accessible register of product recalls and better publicity to reduce consumer confusion.
Dany Cotton, the LFB commissioner, said: “How many more devastating white goods fires do there have to be before the Government makes it easier for consumers to check whether their fridges and freezers are on the recall list?
“Worse still, the second-hand market is under-regulated and there is little to stop people buying kitchen appliances which pose a serious fire risk.”
The LFB is also calling on manufacturers to use less flammable materials in machines. Cotton said: “All new refrigeration and freezing appliances should have a non-combustible backing as standard. Many models still use a flammable plastic backing, which offers very little protection against the foam inside catching alight if a fire starts.”
The coroner at the inquest into the death of Santosh Benjamin Muthiah, who died after saving his wife and two children from a fire that was caused by a faulty Beko fridge-freezer, recommended a series of measures to improve product recalls in 2014.
The Government announced a review of the UK product recall system in November that same year. A working group published its recommendations this year and the Government response is due in the autumn.
The Government did set up a product Recall website to inform the public which goods are safe to use at home, but it is an interim measure that gives links to significant sources of information on product recalls and corrective action but it does not deliver the information itself.
The fault in the Indesit tumble dryer model that had caused the Shepherd’s Bush fire emerged before the incident, with numerous but less severe fires reported. The parent company Whirlpool had been replacing or repairing an estimated 3.8-million potentially faulty dryers across Britain after identifying a fire risk safety defect in November 2015, caused when excess fluff touches the heating element.
It did not issue a product recall, telling customers that they could continue to use their tumble dryer whilst waiting for the modification, provided it was not left unattended. That advice was changed in February after pressure from consumer groups, with owners advised to unplug the appliances and stop using them until they were repaired.