ANOTHER very successful Notting Hill
Carnival has just drawn to a close with around a million people on the streets
of west London having a good time.
Television news
bulletins have been full of colourful pictures of people in fantastic and
beautiful costumes dancing along to the music and they always include a few
shots of police officers joining in the fun.
But those
bulletins have totally failed to inform us that prior to the event 656 people were
arrested, not on the basis of any crime they had committed but on the basis of
crimes that senior police officers thought they might be going to commit.
David Musker,
the Metropolitan Police gold commander for the event, admitted that he does not
care what he arrests people for. He said: “I don’t really care what we arrest
them for, I’ll be [as] lawfully audacious as I can to get them off the streets.
“So whether
they’ve got heroin or they’ve got other class A drugs, [are] drug dealing, [or]
serious violence takes place at carnival, we will try to target them and get
them off the streets.”
According to the Guardian, many people were been
released on pre-charge bail. This means the police have yet to decide whether
there is enough evidence to charge them with any offence. But it does mean they
can impose bail conditions.
And most were
banned from the area where the carnival takes place.
As the Canary on-line news agency previously
reported, the police were already facing accusations of racism for the way they
had been conducted their policing operation.
And as a
spokesperson for the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) told the Canary:
“Carnival receives this treatment precisely because it is the UK’s largest
celebration of Caribbean culture.
“It helps the
police to justify the continued targeting of black communities for the
disproportionate use of stop and search powers in London. It reinforces the
deeply racist idea that these communities are somehow intrinsically – and
uniquely – linked to violence and drug use.
“The Met is also facing criticism for its
use of facial recognition software at the carnival. Musker claimed about the
software: ‘It’s not loaded; it’s loaded with people who we know are involved
with criminality, who are wanted. It’s not a speculative search tool.’
“But given the
police hold more than 20 million images in their facial recognition database,
this statement may give little comfort. Musker also claimed to have consulted
privacy groups to ensure ‘that what we are doing is proportionate, legal and
effective’.
“But it is not
‘proportionate’ to
arrest 656 people when the person in charge of the policing operation doesn’t
care what they’re arrested for.
“It is not
‘proportionate’ to
scan whole crowds to see if they match an image. Whether it is ‘legal’ or not is something
that will be decided in the future.
“And ‘effective’ is at best unknown, and
only relevant if no one cares about our civil liberties.
“Using
pre-charge bail conditions to keep people away from events is nothing new. It
is a tactic that the police have often used against protesters. And it has
faced much criticism.
“But this is on
a massive scale, and from a Met commander who appears to be utterly blasé about
what he’s doing. This policing operation should worry us all. From pre-emptive
arrests to facial scanning, this is not the sort of society any of us should
want to live in.”
No comments:
Post a Comment